Simulations and reduction of data streams from RF15-I KRF collimator aboard the Interball satellite

by

Z. Kordylewski, M. Siarkowski, B. Sylwester and J. Sylwester

Space Research Centre of Polish Academy of Sciences
Solar Physics Division
Kopernika 11, 51-622 Wroclaw, Poland

June, 1995



Abstract

RF15-I instrument developed jointly by the Czech Astronomical Institute and the Space Research Centre of Polish Academy of Sciences is described. Methods are presented which were used to generate and reduce the modulated soft X-ray signal as expected to be measured by the instrument when in orbit. The atlas of modulated signal has been prepared. Deconvolution procedures are described and documented. Successfull launch of the INTERBALL mission took place on 3 August 1995 from Baikhonur cosmodrome.

Key words: Sun-flares-Interbol-X ray Tomograph RF15-I

1  Introduction

The RF15-I instrument is designed to study solar flare X-ray radiation with emphasis on flare energetics. It consists of a block of detectors and the on-board computer PRAM. The block of detectors splits functionally into two parts: soft and hard X-ray photometer observing the whole disk solar emission with high time resolution and solar soft X-ray imager (KRF) called the tomograph. The tomograph unit has been designed and made entirely in the Solar Physics Division of Polish Space Research Centre in Wroclaw. Also, the on-board software related to the tomograph operations has been developed in Wroclaw. The objective of the tomograph is to image solar flare emission in two energy bands 2-4 keV and 4-8 keV by means of the numerical reconstruction of the soft X-ray signal modulated by the collimator due to the rotation of the satellite. The other components of the RF15-I instrument were designed and made in Czech Republic, under guidance of Dr. Frantisek Farnik from Astronomical Institute in Ondrejov.
The instrument has been launched from Baikonur as part of the Scientific payload of the Interball Tail Probe on 3 August 1995. Prompt analysis of the early data indicate that RF15-I instrument is in healthy conditions. The orbit of the Tail Probe is higly excentric with apogeum/perigeum of 200000/400 km and orbital period 96 hours. The satellite is rotationally stabilised; rotation period is  2 minutes. Rotation axis is to be repointed towards the centre of the solar disk periodically (once per 10 days), each time it moves by more than 10o from the Sun due to motion of the Earth around the Sun. The signals incoming from the tomograph are processed in real time by PRAM onboard computer and stored in the onboard memory. About 80 images can be stored between consecutive telemetry dumps.
A concept of modulation collimators is bases on reconstruction of the full two-dimensional image from set of one-dimensional projections. The rotating modulation collimator has been first used in X-ray astronomy by Oda et al. (1965) to determine the angular extension of Sco X-1 source. In 1968, for the first time, the solar hard X-ray flare was localized on the solar disk using this technique (Takakura et al., 1971). Progress in technology and three-axis attitude stabilization of satellites resulted in development of the imaging collimators and telescopes with the position sensitive counters or CCD devices. However, a high-resolution images can still be obtained using low cost spin-axis-stabilized spacecrafts with a simple rotation-modulated collimator signal. One of the best examples of the result of such an experiment are the hard X-ray images of solar flares obtained from the rotating modulation collimator aboard the Japaneese satellite HINOTORI (Tsuneta, 1984).
Below we present a similar, but more advanced concept of the high-resolution tomograph X-ray imager launched aboard the Interbol satellite mission.
In the following Chapters we present a description of the tomograph construction, operation and data reduction which are essential for the reduction of real measurements. Special attention is given to description of the on-board and ground processing of the expected data. Actual codes used for this purpose are attached in the Appendixes.

2  Rotating Modulation Colimator

The Rotating Modulation Colimator (KRF-polish acronime) consists of the two units:

X-ray collimator (XRC) optical solar disc sensor (SDS)

The purpose of XRC is to measure the X-ray signal from flares and active regions modulated due to rotation of the spacecraft. The disc sensor SDS is used to establish coordinates of the centre of the solar disc respective to the X-ray source. This will enable identification of the active region contributing to the X-ray signal.
XRC consists of the 3-grid collimato (see photographs) placed in front of the double proportional counter operating in the 2-4 keV and 4-8 keV energy range. Due to rotation of the satellite, X-ray radiation emitted by flare or the active region passes through different portions of the collimator, depending on the phase of the rotation. The collimator's field of view has radius of 10o.8 , and has a number of narrow ( 11 arcsec) transmission windows separated by 4.8 arcmin. Grids are made of cooper wires of 66.8 microns diameter placed exactly parallel within a distance of 75 microns. The exact location of the grids have been calculated according to the novell strategy developed by Kordylewski (1988) which allowed to use only three grids instead of four which would be necessary in

Fig. 1 Scheme of the X-ray collimator. The front grid consists of the three areas: transparent (no grids), the diagonal bar stopping completly the radiation and the gridded half. Central grid is also partly transparent, matching the front one. The end grid located immediatly in front of the double proportional counter is fully covered by grids. The distances between grids has been optimized in order to create repeated pattern of transparent triangular field of views 11arcsec FWHM separated by 4.8 arcmin.




the classical approach (Nobles et al., 1980). The front and the middle grids cover only approximately half of the conica field of view. The front grid has a special occultation strip allowing to measure ''background'' signal. The last grid covers the whole aperture. This special arrangement of the grids allows for the soft X-ray radiation emitted by solar source to be modulated due to rotation of the satellite (as shown in the Fig. 2). The number of transmission strips depends on the actual pointing of the satellite rotation axis relative to the centre of the solar disc, location of the source on the disc, etc. The position of the satellite rotation axis relative to the ''optical'' Sun is monitored by the SDS unit. It consists of the optical system which image the solar disc on the system of two narrow slits, coaligned with the optical plane of the X-ray collimator as shown schematically in Fig. 3. Rotation of the spacecraft causes the optical disc to circle through slits and the modulation of the intensity of the radiation passing through the slits takes place. This intensity is monitored by the photodiode located behind the slits. Instant values of the solar position phase angle and the offset of the rotation axis are calculated by the on-board computer PRAM from the history of slit cross timing of the previous rotation.

The data gather time unit is 1/128 s for the X-ray detector while outside the radiation belts. During belt crossing the high voltage is turned off from the detector.

After full revolution of the spacecraft in ''normal'' conditions, the following information is collected:

The signals coming from both low and high energy channels are processed in real time by the PRAM computer and depending on the level of the signal, memory available, etc. (as discussed in detail in Sections 4 and 4.1) decision is made whether to store the modulated signal (about 10 kbytes) to the memory for image reconstruction on the ground. If so, before being stored, the information is compressed and periods when the source is outside narrow fields of wiev are discarded. Generally our intention is that for each flare of the GOES class above C5, at least one sequence of modulated signal will be recorded, usually at the flare maximum when the time variation of the signal influence the image restoration process least. Average unmodulated signals from both energy channels are recorded once per revolution.

Fig. 2 Schematic drawing showing various phases of the modulation of the solar radiation in the collimator. The Sun is shown as a small circle with the X-ray source as a small spot. Due to rotation of the spacecraft the apparent position of the source as seen from the position of the detector window follow the circular path. For less than half of the rotation period (phase a) no modulation of the signal is observed. At phase b the source enters the occultation stip which angular width is more than the solar diameter and therefore, at phase c, the solar soft x-ray radiation is totally dlocked and the signal corresponds to detector background. At phase d the source enters the gridded section of the collimator and the signal is modulated when the source crosses individual transmission windows. At each transmission window, the X-ray source is scanned at different angle (changing by p/2 between phases d and f).



Fig. 3 Scheme of the ''motion'' of the visible image of the solar disc across the system of the slits in the SDS unit. At time t1-t8 the electronic system connected
to the photodiode located behind the grids issue flags informing that the solar disc enter/leaves individual slits. Since the apparent angular width of one of the slits is twice the other, the onboard computer is able to recognize the direction of the motion and calculate the instant phase of the rotation from the slit crossing timing. The scheme show only four of eight slit crossing episodes and is made up to apparent angular scale.




fields of view are discarded. Generally our intention is that for each flare of the GOES class above C5, at least one sequence of modulated signal will be recorded, usually at the flare maximum when the time variation of the signal influence the image restoration process least. A verage unmodulated signals from both energy channels are recorded once per revolution.

3  Atlas of the KRF records

In order to better understand the form of the signal to be registered during passage of the source through the modulation zone of the collimator we have performed the task of numerical simulation of the form of the signal for various combinations of the source geometry and relative offset of the source from the direction of spacecraft rotation axis. In particular, we selected the following set of geometry for the sources:

The simulations were performed for various values of the offset between the source and direction of the rotation axis of the spacecraft d. In the simulations we have adopted the following values of the important parameters:

For detailed description of the X-ray detector used in the experiment see Sylwester and Farnik (1990). In calculating the effective collimator transmission allowance had been made for effects of diffraction still important for the soft X-rays because of the very narrow slits in the collimator grids (Kordylewski, 1994). In the simulations we assumed that the source total intensity corresponds to the flux of about 106 photons/cm2/keV/s at Earth (GOES M flare). In Fig. 4 we illustrate the form of the signal coming from the single source (compact flare) having the conical intensity distribution of FWHM = 10 arcsec for case when d = 6o.

Fig. 4: Example of the KRF signal from a simple conical source of 10 arcsec FWHM in case when the rotation axis of the satellite is pointed d = 6o off the source. In the upper panel individual phases of rotation are designated according to Fig. 2. The middle and lower panel shows enlargements of the selected portions from the upper panel. In Figs 4- 16 the statistical noise has been introduced assuming Poisson count statistics and detector background of 6 counts/s.

In Figs 5-8 we show, how the form of the signal (from the same source as in Fig. 4) depends on the offset d. For d < 0o.54 as in Fig. 5, the signal is modulated all the time and the source doesn't cross the occultation bar. In Fig. 6, the case is illustrated when the source enter the occultation strip only once during the rotation. Fig. 7 and 8 give examples of the record to be seen around 4th and 10th day after repointing the satellite, when d = 4o or 10o. All phases of the modulated signal are present in Figs 4,7 and 8 (a, b, c, d, e and f in Fig. 2)


Fig. 5: Same as in Fig. 4 for the offset d =0o.5. This sequence of expected records illustrates the effect of varning offset during several days after repointing to the centre of the Sun. Due to orbital motion of the Earth around the Sun d increases by about 1o per day.



Fig. 6: Same as in Fig. 4 For the offsetd= 3o .





Fig. 7: Same as in Fig. 4 for the offset d= 4o.






Fig. 8: Same as in Fig. 4 for the offset d = 10o.




Figs 9-11 demonstrate the modulation of the signal for assumed double source (e.g. flaring loop footpoints, d = 6o) with various seperation of the sources (5, 10, 20sec respectively). It is seen that even for the separation of 5sec the signal is of double peak form and both sources can be resolved on the restored image.


Fig. 9: Examples of the signal modulation for the source consisting of two emission centres separated by 5 arcsec. From the simulations it is seen that the instrument can separate location of the emission up to 5 arcsec provided that the sources are of £ 2 arcsec wide. In this simulations we assumed that both sources are of equal intensity (footpoints of the flarig arch)






Fig. 10: Same as in Fig.9 for the emission centers separated by 10 arcsec.



Fig. 11: Same as in Fig.9 for the emission centers separated by 20 arcsec.




Fig. 12 demonstrates the case when the source consists of many subsources resembling the whole loop-like structure (also for d = 6o)

Fig. 12: Example of the signal modulation for the configuration of 5 sources resembling the loop-like flaring structure.




Figs 13-16 show the effect of varying angle q between the line connecting the double source and the collimator plane (0o, 30o, 60o, 90o) has been selected and the intensity ratio between the sources is 2 : 1.d = 6o and sources separation is 30sec in this simulations. Depending on the q value the double structure on the modulated record manifest itself at different portions (phases) during the rotation.

Fig. 13: Examples of the dependence of the modulated signal on the relative phase of the second source relative to the first.(Data on parameters). It is seen that the double structure of the transmission peaks arrives at different fingers on the record.




Fig. 14:Same as in Fig. 13 for relative phase 30 o.




Fig. 15:Same as in Fig. 13 for relative phase 60 o .




Fig. 16:Same as in Fig. 13 for relative phase 90o.0




The examples shown above (Figs 4-16) and results of numerous other simulations performed consist of the Atlas of KRF records. This Atlas will be usefull in a fast identification of the nature of the source from ''raw'' measurements.



4  On-board software and data compression algorithms

The data from the KRF sensors are to be processed by the program contained in the EPROM memory within the PRAM comupter. The name of the program is KRF and has been written in assembler language for the NSC600 processor. Writing the program we have had to take into account the following limitations:

  1. the data gather time (DGT) for the soft and hard X-ray signal is 1/128 s (128 Hz frequency)
  2. the volume of the program should not exceed 4KBajts
  3. execution of the KRF program by the processor should not take more than 10% of each DGT
  4. data flow to the onboard tape recorder should depend on the time left to the next ground damp, keeping all the time the 80 Kbits reserve for case that the flare just starts
  5. data from the optical sensor should be all time in-flight processed in order to determine times of the start and stop for the measurement sequence, rotation period of the satellite and the phase of the Sun relative to the collimator occultation bar
  6. processed data from the optical sensor should be stored on- line into special buffer accesible by the attitude system of the satellite in case when the main attitude control system fails
  7. modulated X-ray signal should be transfered to the on-board memory as accurately as possible in case when flare occurs.

The above limitations (especially items 4 and 6) forced, that the structure of the data interpretation algorithm and organization of the data transfer to the recorder is very complicated. In addition, to save the memory, the algorithms cut-off portions of constant signal. Data from X-ray detector are constantly monitored in order to detect the flare, estimate its class and decide when and which observing sequence has to be executed. The data from optical sensor are dumped to the recorder after each 100 sequences (rotations) while the data from X-ray detector are transmitted in the following modes:

Such organization of the data transfer substantially compress the volume of the data to be recorded, but necesserily needs the time from the onboard clock to be assigned to each data pack. To shorten the time info, the ''local clock'' has been introduced (giving the pack No in a sequence).

The activity level is determined by comparing the X-ray signal with the threshold levels which are modified depending on: the memory quota available on the recorder, the history of solar activity and after each 30 rotations. In the next subsection we give more details on the KRF programm structure and the printout of the algorithm is given in the Appendix 9.2.

4.1  Description of the 112 bit scientific portion of the information from KRF

The scientific part of data block is divided into 7 frames, each 16 bytes long. Following the reset of the power and after each 100 measurement cycles
(one cyle = rotational period), 2 measurement cycles are devoted to record data from optical sensor (32 bytes). For other mesurement cycles the following data are recorded artelnatively:

Onboard time of the end of measurement cycle (TPM), maxima and minima for the sum of channels KK1 and KK2 (6 bytes). KK1 and KK2 are soft and Hard signal from X-ray detector
Time and the detailed time variation for the signals (<10 KB)
The detailed structure of the record is as follows:
TP1,TA1,A1,(AT1),[{TB,B,(BT),TK,{X,(XT)}}],TP2,TA2,A2,(AT2)
here
() - designate that the value is recorded if only during the preceding cycle,
the maximum value of KK2 signal exceeded upper threshold.
[] - value will not be recorded if the signal from the collimator is ''wrong''.
{}means that the sequence might be repeated
A1 and A2 maximum of the sum of unmodulated signals in KK1 and KK2 channels, If A1, A2 = 0 it means continuous modulation during the measurement cycle,
AT1 and AT2 maximum value of unmodulated signal in KK2, for the start and stop of the cycle
TP1 and TP2 time of recording A1 and A2
TA1 and TA2 time (in 1/128 s units) for TP1 and TP2 recording
AT1 and AT2 maximum value of the unmodulated KK2 signal for start and stop of the cycle. If AT1, AT2 = 0 means continuous modulation
B minimum of the KK1+KK2 modulation
BT minimum of modulated signal from KK2
TB program time for B measurement
TK program time of recording the value X written in the next byte
X modulated KK1+KK2 signal
XT modulated KK2 for same times as X
The values for X/XT are recorded only in case that X is twice the minimum level of the noise from the previous cycle. The detailed registration of the record is made in the following circumstances:
The upper and lower threshold values increases or decreases by factor 2 each 100 measurement cycles (if no flare occured) and after each full record. Level of filling factor depenedence may overwrite this condition.
In each record, the first byte contains inormation on the content of the following bytes. For most bytes the second byte is also used for information on the content, and bytes No. 3 and 4 contain sometimes information on the content of the previous record.
In case that the internal PRAM buffer is filled, the next record contains information on the time where the data were lost (how many records were not sent to the recorder).

5  Deconvolution of KRF images

X-ray source (flare) present on the solar disk is scaned almost linearly at various position angles by spinning motion of the satellite. The detector signal is summed in one direction as a one-dimensional projection of the two-dimensional image. During rotation of the instrument, slices from many projection angles are obtained. Resulting set of one-dimensional scans is used for reconstruction of the full two-dimensional image of the source. We define a fixed image space where f(k, l) is a flux in pixel (k, l) (Fig. 17). During one-dimensional scan the flux in each column m of this image is convolved with collimator transmission function g so the flux meassured at bin number j is :



The collimator transmission function is of triangular form with FWHM = b = 11  arcsec separated by pitch distance p = 270  arcsec. Transmision in bin j is thus:



where d is bin width, n = 0, 1, 2, .... is the number of transmission window. For the scan with position angle fi, the value of  m in Eq. 1 can be expressed
as : k cos fi + l sin fi. The flux registered at bin j is now of the form

Fig. 17 Definition of image space f(k, l), scanning direction and transmission band.



form (see Fig. 17):




In practice only one transmission triangle is active since the dimenssion of the flare is usually less then » 3 - 4  arcmin. Thus the component np was neglected in Eq. 2. We can thus say that two-dimensional brightness distribution fkl is transformed into the set of one-dimensional scans Iij through the four-dimensional transmission function g ijkl.



The main purpose of the restoration process is to solve above set of equations in respect to f kl. The method used here is an elaborated iterative procedure. The uniform brightness distribution f kl = const is assumed at the start of the iterative process. The next ( n+1 ) approximation f n+1kl is obtained from the previous
one ( f n kl ) multiplying it be the appropriate correction factor. This correction factor is the ratio of the observed (O) and calculated (C) flux ratio in each
bin, weighted by the collimator transmission function:



In case that the observed flux at bin j is twice the calculated one, we inrease twice the fluxes in each of the pixels kl which contribute to this bin in proportion to the corresponding contributions of the collimator transmission function. The quality of the fit is measured in terms of c2 statistics. The iteration process is terminated when the value of reduced c2 1.0  is reached. The technique used here is a straightforward extension of earlier one- and two-dimensional iterative methods commonly used for solar X-ray data analysis (Sylwester, Schrijver &  Mewe 1980; Svestka et al., 1983). It is analogous of the computer tomography procedure used in medical applications, where scans from many directions are used to generate two- -dimensional picture of the human body internal structure. The method used is inherently positively constrained because the observed to calculated flux ratios are used as the correction factors. In the contrary to noniterative methods (e.g. Fast Fourier Transform) we can adjust also the pixel size, inependently of the size/number of modulation transmission peaks (depending on d). For collimator transmision function with FWHM = b 11  arcsec we usually use d = 10 arcsec, but we can look for the solution with pixel dimension d £ 10 x 10  arcsec. In Fig. 18 we illustrate how the quality of the restored image depends on the adopted size of d. In this example we restored an synthetic image of the cross by taking into account 18 azimuthal projections,the bin apacing 10 arcsec and pixel sizes 10, 5 and 2 arcsec respectively. Another example is shown in Fig. 19. Here we reconstruct an image of three conical sources with different sizes and intensities.
The restoration was performed using 36 linear scans with of bin spacing 10 arcsec and different and the pixel sizes as in the previous example. The examples shown in Figs 18 and 19 cleary indicate that the resolution better than 5 arcsec which might be acheived after deconvolution. In practice the actual resolution of the deconvolved image will depend on many factors such as the intensity and structure of flare, its time variation, the number of available scans, the stability of satellite pointing, the signal to noise ratio etc.

Fig. 18: The reconstructed image of synthetic cross structure from 18 azimuthal projection. Reconstruction was performed for three different image pixel size. Fig. 19: Same as Fig. 18 for three conical sources of different size and intensity.



6  Possible biases of the image reconstruction

One of the most unpleasent situation for restoring images using the above descibed instrument and method would happen if the pointing of the sattelite rotation axis happen to precess/nutate at the substantial rate during the single rotation period. Even 10 arcsec variations of the pointing over single rotation might be dangerous. However, we are prepared to deal with such a complication since we can restore the harmonics of the time variation of the position of the rotation axis on the sphere from elaborated programm of analysis of the optical sensor timing. If found necessary, we are ready to implement such an algorithm.

7  Summary

This contribution contains detailed description of the Rotating Modullation Collimator (KRF Tomograph) which constitutes the part of RF15-I soft X-ray Photometer launched aboard the Interball Mission on August 3, 1995. We show examples of the simulation of the data streams expected from this instrument and discuss the programs which are used by the on-board computer to analyze and compress the data. We also illustrate the imaging capabilities of the instrument by showing examples of the synthetic source images obtained in the process of numerical picture reconstruction.

8  Acknowledgements

The described project has been possible thanks to the Grant 2 Z6Z 001 05p12 of the Polish Commettee for Scientific Research (KBN) The authors would like to acknowledge contribution of many people who developed the construction, made the KRF hardware and electronics, performed instrument alignment and made tests of the KRF within the RF15-I assembly (J. Bakala, W. Kucia, S. Nowak, S. Plocieniak, E. Stanczyk, W. Trzebinski, R. Zawerbny).

References

Antonucci, E., Dodero, M.A., Peres, G., Serio, S., and Rosner, R. 1987, Astrophys. J., 322, 522.
Oda M. et. al., 1965, Nature, 205, 554 lub
Bruner, M. 1987, Solar Phys., 113, 101.
Fisher, G.H., Canfield, R.C. and McClymont, A.N. 1985a, Astrophys. J,
Gursky H. et al., 1966, Astrophys. J., 146, 310
Kordylewski Z., 1988, private communication
Kordylewski Z., 1994, private communication
Nobles R.A., Acton L.W., Joki E.G., Leibacher J.W. and Peterson R.C., 1980, Applied Optics, 19, 2957
Svestka Z. et al., 1983, Solar Phys., 85, 313
Sylwester J., Schrijver J., Mewe R., 1980, Solar Phys., 67, 285
Sylwester J., Farnik F., 1990, Bulletin Astronomical Institute of Czechoslovakia, Vol 41, No 3, 149
Takakura T. et al , 1971, Solar Phys., 16, 454
Tsuneta S., 1984, Ann. Tokyo Astron. Obs,. 2nd Ser., 20, 1 lub inne
Cheng, C.-C., Oran, E.S., Doschek, G.A., Boris, J.P. and Mariska, J.T. 1983, Astrophys. J., 265, 1090.

BACK HOME PAGE CBK
Page created by Jaroslaw Bakala ( jb@cbk.pan.wroc.pl)
Web Curator:Janusz Sylwester ( js@cbk.pan.wroc.pl)


File translated from TEX by TTH, version 1.57.